Is the 2023 Rivian R1S a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
2ndof 22
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 46.7 cu ft.
- 2nd of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (2nd of 24), cargo (2nd of 22).
- Weakest: rear legroom (16th of 19, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $78,000 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 835 hp | 2nd of 24 | 96% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 46.7 cu ft | 2nd of 22 | 95% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.6 in | 16th of 19 | 11% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 6th of 23 | 45% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
Show all 22
- Genesis GV80 34.9 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 27.1 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree