Is the 2023 BMW X3 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
12thof 23
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 28.7 cu ft.
- 12th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (12th of 24), cargo (12th of 23).
- Weakest: towing (17th of 20, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $74,400 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 13th of 17 | 19% | |
| Most horsepower | 473 hp | 14th of 24 | 39% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 28.7 cu ft | 12th of 23 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.4 in | 18th of 21 | 15% | |
| Max towing | 4,400 lb | 17th of 20 | 11% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade ESV 94.1 cu ft
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer L 85.3 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer 70.8 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
Show all 23
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- BMW X3 M 28.7 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Jaguar I PACE 25.3 cu ft
- Maserati Grecale 20.1 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Fisker Ocean 16.8 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree