Is the 2022 BMW X3 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
10thof 23
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 28.7 cu ft.
- 10th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (9th of 24), cargo (10th of 23).
- Weakest: rear legroom (18th of 21).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $70,100 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | 17 mpg | 14th of 18 | 18% | |
| Most horsepower | 473 hp | 9th of 24 | 61% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 28.7 cu ft | 10th of 23 | 59% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.4 in | 18th of 21 | 15% | |
| Max towing | 4,400 lb | 15th of 21 | 20% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Cadillac Escalade ESV 94.1 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 72.9 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
Show all 23
- Hyundai Nexo 29.6 cu ft
- BMW X3 M 28.7 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- Jeep Wagoneer 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Jaguar I PACE 23.2 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 17.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 14.6 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: BMW X6.
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree