Is the 2023 Jaguar I PACE a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 18 SUVs
9thof 18
- Top half on 2 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 25.3 cu ft.
- 9th of 18 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (9th of 19), cargo (9th of 18).
- Weakest: rear legroom (17th of 18).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $71,300 | 17th of 19 | 11% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 394 hp | 9th of 19 | 56% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 25.3 cu ft | 9th of 18 | 53% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.0 in | 17th of 18 | 6% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus GX 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus RZ 34.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 31.5 cu ft
- Hyundai Nexo 29.6 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 4xe 27.7 cu ft
- INFINITI QX55 26.9 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
Show all 18
- Jaguar I PACE 25.3 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Maserati Grecale 20.1 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Fisker Ocean 16.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 19 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree