Is the 2023 Fisker Ocean a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
22ndof 22
- Top half on 2 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.8 cu ft.
- 22nd of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (1st of 22), power (8th of 23).
- Weakest: cargo (22nd of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $68,999 | 18th of 24 | 26% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 468 hp | 8th of 23 | 68% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.8 cu ft | 22nd of 22 | 0% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.8 in | 1st of 22 | 100% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lexus GX 46.7 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Lexus RZ 34.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
- Jaguar F PACE 31.5 cu ft
- Hyundai Nexo 29.6 cu ft
- Lexus RX 29.6 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
Show all 22
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 4xe 27.7 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX55 26.9 cu ft
- Jaguar I PACE 25.3 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Maserati Grecale 20.1 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 18.0 cu ft
- Fisker Ocean 16.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Polestar 3.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree