Is the 2023 BMW X7 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 SUVs
17thof 17
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 12.8 cu ft.
- 17th of 17 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (1st of 14), power (3rd of 18).
- Weakest: cargo (17th of 17).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $77,850 | 9th of 18 | 53% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 1st of 14 | 92% | |
| Most horsepower | 631 hp | 3rd of 18 | 88% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 12.8 cu ft | 17th of 17 | 0% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.6 in | 14th of 16 | 13% | |
| Max towing | 7,500 lb | 13th of 18 | 29% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 57.5 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
Show all 17
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 27.1 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 18 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree