Is the 2025 BMW X7 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
24thof 24
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 12.8 cu ft.
- 24th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (5th of 24), mpg (2nd of 17).
- Weakest: cargo (24th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $84,300 | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 2nd of 17 | 81% | |
| Most horsepower | 631 hp | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 12.8 cu ft | 24th of 24 | 0% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.6 in | 17th of 22 | 24% | |
| Max towing | 7,500 lb | 15th of 23 | 36% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 72.5 cu ft
- Lincoln Navigator 69.9 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 60.8 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Lincoln Aviator 42.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Toyota Land Cruiser 37.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 35.8 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Volvo EX90 35.6 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- Lotus Eletre 24.0 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 22.0 cu ft
- Lucid Gravity 21.3 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 20.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree