Is the 2025 Rivian R1S a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
4thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 46.7 cu ft.
- 4th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (1st of 24), cargo (4th of 24).
- Weakest: rear legroom (20th of 22, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $75,805 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 1,050 hp | 1st of 24 | 100% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 46.7 cu ft | 4th of 24 | 87% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.6 in | 20th of 22 | 5% | |
| Max towing | 7,700 lb | 5th of 23 | 64% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Lexus TX 57.4 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus GX 45.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Kia EV9 43.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- Lincoln Aviator 42.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 37.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 35.8 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Volvo EX90 35.6 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 Coupe 29.3 cu ft
- Cadillac LYRIQ 28.0 cu ft
- Lotus Eletre 24.0 cu ft
- Lucid Gravity 21.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree