Is the 2025 Volvo XC40 Recharge a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
19thof 22
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.0 cu ft.
- 19th of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (4th of 22), towing (6th of 16).
- Weakest: price (20th of 22, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $52,500 | 20th of 22 | 5% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 8th of 17 | 50% | |
| Most horsepower | 402 hp | 4th of 22 | 81% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.0 cu ft | 19th of 22 | 5% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.1 in | 16th of 21 | 10% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 6th of 16 | 53% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.2 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 4xe 27.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
Show all 22
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree