Is the 2025 Genesis GV60 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
12thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 24.0 cu ft.
- 12th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (2nd of 24), rear legroom (9th of 23).
- Weakest: price (21st of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $52,350 | 21st of 24 | 13% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 429 hp | 2nd of 24 | 96% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 24.0 cu ft | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.6 in | 9th of 23 | 59% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 12th of 18 | 18% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco 38.3 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.2 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 4xe 27.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Nissan Ariya 22.8 cu ft
- Lexus NX 22.7 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.2 cu ft
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree