Is the 2023 Volvo XC40 Recharge a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 SUVs
17thof 20
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.0 cu ft.
- 17th of 20 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (1st of 16), power (2nd of 20).
- Weakest: price (18th of 20).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $53,550 | 18th of 20 | 11% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 5th of 14 | 46% | |
| Most horsepower | 402 hp | 2nd of 20 | 84% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.0 cu ft | 17th of 20 | 11% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.1 in | 15th of 20 | 11% | |
| Max towing | 4,630 lb | 1st of 16 | 100% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota RAV4 Prime 33.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 5 27.2 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.1 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 24.8 cu ft
Show all 20
- Genesis GV60 24.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 Recharge 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
- Volvo C40 Recharge 15.0 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree