Is the 2023 Volvo S90 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 18 sedans
13thof 18
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 13.5 cu ft.
- 13th of 18 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (1st of 21), mpg (3rd of 19).
- Weakest: cargo (13th of 18, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $56,950 | 13th of 22 | 43% | |
| Best combined mpg | 30 mpg | 3rd of 19 | 89% | |
| Most horsepower | 455 hp | 7th of 22 | 71% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 13.5 cu ft | 13th of 18 | 24% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.4 in | 1st of 21 | 100% | |
| Max towing | 1,650 lb | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Audi A6 Allroad 30.0 cu ft
- Audi A7 24.9 cu ft
- Audi S7 24.6 cu ft
- Maserati Ghibli 17.7 cu ft
- Lexus LS 16.9 cu ft
- Toyota Crown 15.2 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
Show all 18
- BMW 5 Series 14.0 cu ft
- Lexus ES 13.9 cu ft
- Audi A6 13.7 cu ft
- Audi S6 13.7 cu ft
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
- Volvo S90 13.5 cu ft
- Genesis G80 13.1 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Jaguar XF 11.0 cu ft
- Toyota Mirai 9.6 cu ft
No figure: Lucid Air, Mercedes-Benz CLS, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Mercedes-Benz EQE.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree