Is the 2023 Mercedes-Benz E-Class a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 19 sedans
1stof 19
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 35.0 cu ft.
- 1st of 19 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 19), power (4th of 24).
- Weakest: rear legroom (15th of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $56,750 | 14th of 24 | 43% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 9th of 20 | 47% | |
| Most horsepower | 603 hp | 4th of 24 | 87% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 35.0 cu ft | 1st of 19 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.8 in | 15th of 23 | 36% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Audi A6 Allroad 30.0 cu ft
- Audi A7 24.9 cu ft
- Audi S7 24.6 cu ft
- Maserati Ghibli 17.7 cu ft
- Toyota Crown 15.2 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
- BMW 5 Series 14.0 cu ft
Show all 19
- Lexus ES 13.9 cu ft
- Audi A6 13.7 cu ft
- Audi S6 13.7 cu ft
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Genesis G80 13.1 cu ft
- BMW M3 13.0 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 6 11.2 cu ft
- Jaguar XF 11.0 cu ft
- Toyota Mirai 9.6 cu ft
No figure: Lucid Air, Mercedes-Benz CLS, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Mercedes-Benz EQE, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree