Is the 2023 Genesis G80 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 sedans
15thof 20
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 13.1 cu ft.
- 15th of 20 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (7th of 24), power (12th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (15th of 20).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $50,000 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 10th of 21 | 45% | |
| Most horsepower | 375 hp | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 13.1 cu ft | 15th of 20 | 26% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.7 in | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Audi A6 Allroad 30.0 cu ft
- Audi A7 24.9 cu ft
- Dodge Charger 16.5 cu ft
- Chrysler 300 16.3 cu ft
- Toyota Crown 15.2 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
- BMW 5 Series 14.0 cu ft
Show all 20
- Lexus ES 13.9 cu ft
- Audi A6 13.7 cu ft
- Audi S6 13.7 cu ft
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Volvo S90 13.5 cu ft
- Genesis G80 13.1 cu ft
- BMW M3 13.0 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 6 11.2 cu ft
- Jaguar XF 11.0 cu ft
- Toyota Mirai 9.6 cu ft
No figure: Kia Stinger, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Mercedes-Benz EQE, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree