Is the 2024 Genesis G80 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 19 sedans
14thof 19
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 13.1 cu ft.
- 14th of 19 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (6th of 22), price (11th of 22).
- Weakest: mpg (10th of 17, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $54,400 | 11th of 22 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 25 mpg | 10th of 17 | 19% | |
| Most horsepower | 375 hp | 10th of 22 | 48% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 13.1 cu ft | 14th of 19 | 28% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.7 in | 6th of 22 | 76% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 33.1 cu ft
- Audi A6 Allroad 30.0 cu ft
- Audi A7 24.9 cu ft
- BMW 5 Series 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQE 18.4 cu ft
- BMW i5 17.3 cu ft
- Toyota Crown 15.2 cu ft
- Lexus ES 13.9 cu ft
Show all 19
- Audi A6 13.7 cu ft
- Audi S6 13.7 cu ft
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Volvo S90 13.5 cu ft
- Genesis G80 13.1 cu ft
- BMW M3 13.0 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 6 11.2 cu ft
- Jaguar XF 11.0 cu ft
- Toyota Mirai 9.6 cu ft
No figure: Lucid Air, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2024: 83. The photo shows the 22 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree