Is the 2023 Audi S4 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 sedans
11thof 17
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 12.0 cu ft.
- 11th of 17 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (7th of 24), power (16th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (19th of 22, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $52,800 | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Best combined mpg | 24 mpg | 19th of 22 | 10% | |
| Most horsepower | 349 hp | 16th of 24 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 12.0 cu ft | 11th of 17 | 31% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.7 in | 7th of 24 | 65% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Audi A6 Allroad 30.0 cu ft
- Audi A4 Allroad 24.2 cu ft
- Tesla Model 3 19.8 cu ft
- BMW 3 Series 17.0 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
- Audi A6 13.7 cu ft
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
Show all 17
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- BMW M3 13.0 cu ft
- Audi A4 12.0 cu ft
- Audi S4 12.0 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Volvo S60 11.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 6 11.2 cu ft
- Lexus IS 10.8 cu ft
- Genesis G70 10.5 cu ft
No figure: Alfa Romeo Giulia, Audi A5 Sportback, Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing, Kia Stinger, Mercedes-Benz CLA, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree