Is the 2025 Nissan Kicks Play a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 12 SUVs
6thof 12
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 25.3 cu ft.
- 6th of 12 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (1st of 12), mpg (2nd of 12).
- Weakest: power (11th of 12, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $21,520 | 1st of 12 | 91% | |
| Best combined mpg | 33 mpg | 2nd of 12 | 82% | |
| Most horsepower | 141 hp | 11th of 12 | 0% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 25.3 cu ft | 6th of 12 | 45% | |
| Rear legroom | 33.5 in | 11th of 12 | 9% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks Play 25.3 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
Show all 12
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 19.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 12 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree