Is the 2023 Chrysler 300 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 18 sedans
3rdof 18
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.3 cu ft.
- 3rd of 18 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: power (3rd of 20), cargo (3rd of 18).
- Weakest: mpg (17th of 18, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $36,145 | 9th of 20 | 58% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 17th of 18 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 485 hp | 3rd of 20 | 89% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.3 cu ft | 3rd of 18 | 88% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.1 in | 3rd of 20 | 84% | |
| Max towing | 1,000 lb | 4th of 8 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Honda Accord 16.7 cu ft
- Dodge Charger 16.5 cu ft
- Chrysler 300 16.3 cu ft
- Hyundai Sonata 16.0 cu ft
- Kia K5 16.0 cu ft
- Chevrolet Malibu 15.7 cu ft
- Nissan Altima 15.4 cu ft
- Toyota Crown 15.2 cu ft
Show all 18
- Subaru Legacy 15.1 cu ft
- Toyota Camry 15.1 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
- Lexus ES 13.9 cu ft
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
- Genesis G80 13.1 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 6 11.2 cu ft
- Jaguar XF 11.0 cu ft
- Toyota Mirai 9.6 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree