Is the 2023 Cadillac CT5 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 sedans
17thof 21
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 11.9 cu ft.
- 17th of 21 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: power (2nd of 24), price (7th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (17th of 21).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $38,195 | 7th of 24 | 74% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 12th of 22 | 43% | |
| Most horsepower | 668 hp | 2nd of 24 | 96% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 11.9 cu ft | 17th of 21 | 20% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.9 in | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Audi A4 Allroad 24.2 cu ft
- Honda Accord 16.7 cu ft
- Dodge Charger 16.5 cu ft
- Chrysler 300 16.3 cu ft
- Nissan Altima 15.4 cu ft
- Toyota Crown 15.2 cu ft
- Toyota Camry 15.1 cu ft
Show all 21
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
- BMW 5 Series 14.0 cu ft
- Lexus ES 13.9 cu ft
- Audi A6 13.7 cu ft
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Genesis G80 13.1 cu ft
- Audi A4 12.0 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Volvo S60 11.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 6 11.2 cu ft
- Jaguar XF 11.0 cu ft
- Toyota Mirai 9.6 cu ft
No figure: Kia Stinger, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree