Is the 2022 Volkswagen Atlas a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
3rdof 24
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 55.5 cu ft.
- 3rd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (3rd of 24), price (8th of 24).
- Weakest: rear legroom (22nd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $34,335 | 8th of 24 | 70% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 5th of 24 | 35% | |
| Most horsepower | 276 hp | 20th of 24 | 13% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 55.5 cu ft | 3rd of 24 | 91% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.6 in | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 10th of 24 | 22% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota Sequoia 66.6 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 57.8 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
Show all 24
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 34.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- Nissan Murano 32.1 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 12.8 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree