Is the 2020 Mitsubishi Outlander a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
11thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 33.0 cu ft.
- 11th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (5th of 24), mpg (9th of 24).
- Weakest: power (19th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $24,895 | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 9th of 24 | 61% | |
| Most horsepower | 224 hp | 19th of 24 | 22% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 33.0 cu ft | 11th of 24 | 57% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.9 in | 18th of 24 | 22% | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 6th of 23 | 45% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Buick Envision 57.3 cu ft
- Honda Passport 50.5 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Nissan Rogue 39.3 cu ft
- Ford Edge 39.2 cu ft
- Kia Sorento 38.0 cu ft
- Toyota RAV4 37.6 cu ft
- Ford Escape 37.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 36.3 cu ft
- Hyundai Santa Fe 35.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander 33.0 cu ft
- Subaru Outback 32.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Subaru Forester 31.1 cu ft
- Mazda CX-5 30.9 cu ft
- Chevrolet Blazer 30.5 cu ft
- Chevrolet Equinox 29.9 cu ft
- GMC Terrain 29.6 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Jeep Cherokee 25.8 cu ft
- Cadillac XT4 22.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Lexus NX 17.7 cu ft
- Dodge Journey 10.7 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree