Is the 2020 Cadillac XT6 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
22ndof 23
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 12.6 cu ft.
- 22nd of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (4th of 20), price (12th of 23).
- Weakest: cargo (22nd of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $52,695 | 12th of 23 | 50% | |
| Best combined mpg | 20 mpg | 14th of 22 | 38% | |
| Most horsepower | 310 hp | 19th of 23 | 14% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 12.6 cu ft | 22nd of 23 | 5% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.1 in | 4th of 20 | 74% | |
| Max towing | 4,000 lb | 19th of 22 | 10% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 51.7 cu ft
- Acura MDX 43.4 cu ft
- Acura MDX Sport Hybrid 43.4 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 41.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 34.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
Show all 23
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.1 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Lexus RX 23.0 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 18.9 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 16.0 cu ft
- GMC Yukon 15.3 cu ft
- Cadillac Escalade 15.2 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree