Is the 2020 Land Rover Discovery a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 23 SUVs
4thof 23
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 41.2 cu ft.
- 4th of 23 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: towing (1st of 23), cargo (4th of 23).
- Weakest: rear legroom (12th of 20).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $52,300 | 11th of 23 | 55% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 8th of 22 | 48% | |
| Most horsepower | 340 hp | 13th of 23 | 45% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 41.2 cu ft | 4th of 23 | 86% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.6 in | 12th of 20 | 42% | |
| Max towing | 8,201 lb | 1st of 23 | 95% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Acura MDX 43.4 cu ft
- Acura MDX Sport Hybrid 43.4 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 41.2 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 34.1 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
Show all 23
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.2 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.1 cu ft
- Lexus RX 23.0 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 16.0 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree