Is the 2022 Cadillac XT6 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 22 SUVs
22ndof 22
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 12.6 cu ft.
- 22nd of 22 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (7th of 22), price (14th of 24).
- Weakest: cargo (22nd of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $48,595 | 14th of 24 | 43% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 4th of 23 | 36% | |
| Most horsepower | 310 hp | 14th of 24 | 43% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 12.6 cu ft | 22nd of 22 | 0% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.1 in | 7th of 22 | 67% | |
| Max towing | 4,000 lb | 23rd of 24 | 4% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
Show all 22
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 34.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 17.7 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
No figure: BMW X6, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree