Mazda CX-50 vs Mitsubishi Outlander (2026)
Price gap, MSRP + destination
$810
- CX-50: $810 cheaper, 13 hp more.
- Outlander: 2 mpg better, 2 more seats.
- Outlander wins 5 of 12 measures.
| Measure | CX-50 | Outlander | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSRP + destination | $31,395 | $32,205 | CX-50 |
| Horsepower | 187 hp | 174 hp | CX-50 |
| Torque | 185 lb-ft | 206 lb-ft | Outlander |
| MPG combined | 26 mpg | 28 mpg | Outlander |
| Cargo, max | 31.4 cu ft to 56.3 cu ft | 64.3 cu ft | N/A |
| Cargo, seats up | 31.4 cu ft | 10.9 cu ft | CX-50 |
| Rear legroom | 39.8 in | 39.9 in | About the same |
| Front legroom | 41.7 in | 41.7 in | About the same |
| Length | 185.8 in | 185.8 in | Not scored |
| Width | 75.6 in | 73.2 in to 84.4 in | N/A |
| Curb weight | 3,741 lb | 3,681 lb | Not scored |
| Towing | 2,000 lb | 2,000 lb | About the same |
| Seats | 5 | 7 | Outlander |
| Ground clearance | 8.3 in | 8.3 in | About the same |
| 0-60 mph | 9.5 s tested | 8.7 s estimate | Outlander |
| Basic warranty | 3 yr / 36,000 mi | 5 yr / 60,000 mi | Outlander |
Not scored: length, width, curb weight. N/A rows are not counted.
Nearest trims by price
| Trim | Nearest in price | Gap |
|---|---|---|
| CX-50 2.5 S Select AWD $29,900 | Outlander ES FWD $29,995 | $95 |
| Outlander ES FWD $29,995 | CX-50 2.5 S Select AWD $29,900 | $95 |
Cost to run
About the same over 6 years.
12,000 miles a year. Gas $3.20. Electricity 17 cents per kWh.
| Cost | CX-50 | Outlander |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP + destination | $31,395 | $32,205 |
| Fuel or charging, 1 year | $1,477 | $1,371 |
| Fuel or charging, 6 years | $8,862 | $8,229 |
| Total, 6 years | $40,257 | $40,434 |
Which is better for me?
Weight each group from 0 to 10. MPG uses fuel or charging cost.
Equal weights: CX-50 wins.
Outlander wins if MPG weight is 7 or more.
| Group | Ahead | By |
|---|---|---|
| Price | CX-50 | 3% |
| MPG | Outlander | 7% |
| Power | CX-50 | 7% |
| Space | N/A | |
| Towing | About the same |
Other years
What this cannot tell you
Your price and mpg will differ.
Reliability and safety are not included.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree