Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-50 (2026)
Price gap, MSRP + destination
$975
- CR-V: 4 mpg better, 3 hp more.
- CX-50: $975 cheaper, 500 lb more towing.
- CR-V wins 5 of 12 measures.
| Measure | CR-V | CX-50 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSRP + destination | $32,370 | $31,395 | CX-50 |
| Horsepower | 190 hp | 187 hp | CR-V |
| Torque | 179 lb-ft | 185 lb-ft | CX-50 |
| MPG combined | 30 mpg | 26 mpg | CR-V |
| Cargo, max | 76.5 cu ft | 31.4 cu ft to 56.3 cu ft | N/A |
| Cargo, seats up | 39.3 cu ft | 31.4 cu ft | CR-V |
| Rear legroom | 41.0 in | 39.8 in | CR-V |
| Front legroom | 41.3 in | 41.7 in | About the same |
| Length | 184.8 in | 185.8 in | Not scored |
| Width | 73.5 in | 75.6 in | Not scored |
| Curb weight | 3,472 lb | 3,741 lb | Not scored |
| Towing | 1,500 lb | 2,000 lb | CX-50 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | About the same |
| Ground clearance | 7.8 in | 8.3 in | CX-50 |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8 s estimate | 9.5 s tested | CR-V |
| Basic warranty | 3 yr / 36,000 mi | 3 yr / 36,000 mi | About the same |
Not scored: length, width, curb weight. N/A rows are not counted.
Nearest trims by price
| Trim | Nearest in price | Gap |
|---|---|---|
| CR-V LX 2WD $30,920 | CX-50 2.5 S Select AWD $29,900 | $1,020 |
| CX-50 2.5 S Select AWD $29,900 | CR-V LX 2WD $30,920 | $1,020 |
Hybrid vs hybrid
| Measure | CR-V | CX-50 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSRP + destination | $37,080 | $36,245 | CX-50 |
| Horsepower | 204 hp | 176 hp | CR-V |
| Torque | 138 lb-ft | 163 lb-ft | CX-50 |
| MPG combined | 40 mpg | 38 mpg | CR-V |
| Cargo, seats up | 36.3 cu ft | 31.4 cu ft | CR-V |
| Rear legroom | 41.0 in | 39.8 in | CR-V |
| Front legroom | 41.3 in | 41.7 in | About the same |
| Towing | 1,000 lb | 1,500 lb | CX-50 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | About the same |
| Ground clearance | 7.8 in | 7.8 in | About the same |
| Basic warranty | 3 yr / 36,000 mi | 3 yr / 36,000 mi | About the same |
CR-V wins 4 of 11 measures.
Cost to run
About the same over 6 years.
12,000 miles a year. Gas $3.20. Electricity 17 cents per kWh.
| Cost | CR-V | CX-50 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP + destination | $32,370 | $31,395 |
| Fuel or charging, 1 year | $1,280 | $1,477 |
| Fuel or charging, 6 years | $7,680 | $8,862 |
| Total, 6 years | $40,050 | $40,257 |
Which is better for me?
Weight each group from 0 to 10. MPG uses fuel or charging cost.
Equal weights: CX-50 wins.
CR-V wins if Towing weight is 2 or less.
| Group | Ahead | By |
|---|---|---|
| Price | CX-50 | 3% |
| MPG | CR-V | 13% |
| Power | CR-V | 2% |
| Space | N/A | |
| Towing | CX-50 | 25% |
Other years
What this cannot tell you
Your price and mpg will differ.
Reliability and safety are not included.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree