Is the 2026 Mercedes-Benz EQS a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 14 sedans
9thof 14
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 15.5 cu ft.
- 9th of 14 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (3rd of 13), price (7th of 16).
- Weakest: cargo (9th of 14).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $89,950 | 7th of 16 | 60% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 649 hp | 7th of 16 | 60% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 15.5 cu ft | 9th of 14 | 38% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.0 in | 3rd of 13 | 83% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 33.1 cu ft
- Audi A6 Allroad 30.0 cu ft
- Audi RS 7 25.0 cu ft
- BMW 5 Series 18.4 cu ft
- BMW M5 17.7 cu ft
- Porsche Panamera 17.4 cu ft
- BMW i5 17.3 cu ft
- Lexus LS 16.9 cu ft
Show all 14
- Mercedes-Benz EQS 15.5 cu ft
- Porsche Taycan 14.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz S-Class 12.8 cu ft
- Audi A8 12.5 cu ft
- Genesis G90 12.0 cu ft
- Audi S e-tron GT 9.2 cu ft
No figure: Audi A6, Lucid Air.
Sedans in 2026: 71. The photo shows the 16 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree