Is the 2025 Mercedes-Benz EQS a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 14 sedans
8thof 14
- Top half on 2 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 15.5 cu ft.
- 8th of 14 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (3rd of 12), power (5th of 15).
- Weakest: price (11th of 16).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $104,400 | 11th of 16 | 33% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 649 hp | 5th of 15 | 71% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 15.5 cu ft | 8th of 14 | 46% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.0 in | 3rd of 12 | 82% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Audi A6 Allroad 30.0 cu ft
- Audi RS 7 25.0 cu ft
- Audi A7 24.9 cu ft
- Audi S7 24.6 cu ft
- BMW M5 17.7 cu ft
- Porsche Panamera 17.4 cu ft
- Lexus LS 16.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS 15.5 cu ft
Show all 14
- Porsche Taycan 14.3 cu ft
- Audi S6 e-tron Sportback 14.0 cu ft
- Audi S6 13.7 cu ft
- Audi A8 12.5 cu ft
- Genesis G90 12.0 cu ft
- Karma Revero 6.4 cu ft
No figure: Audi e-tron GT, Mercedes-Benz S-Class.
Sedans in 2025: 83. The photo shows the 16 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree