Is the 2025 Lexus TX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
3rdof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 57.4 cu ft.
- 3rd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (2nd of 20), cargo (3rd of 24).
- Weakest: towing (10th of 24, tied with 11).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $55,140 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | 29 mpg | 2nd of 20 | 95% | |
| Most horsepower | 404 hp | 9th of 24 | 65% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 57.4 cu ft | 3rd of 24 | 91% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.5 in | 8th of 24 | 65% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 10th of 24 | 13% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Expedition 60.8 cu ft
- Toyota Grand Highlander 57.9 cu ft
- Lexus TX 57.4 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 46.0 cu ft
- Kia EV9 43.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Aviator 42.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-70 39.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 35.8 cu ft
- Volvo EX90 35.6 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 23.0 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 22.9 cu ft
- Chevrolet Traverse 22.9 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 22.3 cu ft
- Lucid Gravity 21.3 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 20.4 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 18.6 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree