Is the 2023 Lexus LS a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 7 sedans
4thof 7
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.9 cu ft.
- 4th of 7 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: price (2nd of 8), mpg (3rd of 7).
- Weakest: rear legroom (5th of 6).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $77,385 | 2nd of 8 | 86% | |
| Best combined mpg | 25 mpg | 3rd of 7 | 67% | |
| Most horsepower | 416 hp | 6th of 8 | 29% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.9 cu ft | 4th of 7 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.9 in | 5th of 6 | 20% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- BMW 7 Series 19.1 cu ft
- Maserati Quattroporte 18.7 cu ft
- Porsche Panamera 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus LS 16.9 cu ft
- Volvo S90 13.5 cu ft
- Audi A8 12.5 cu ft
- Genesis G90 12.0 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQS.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 8 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree