Is the 2021 BMW X4 M a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 SUVs
13thof 17
- No. Top half on 1 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 18.5 cu ft.
- 13th of 17 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (8th of 19), cargo (13th of 17).
- Weakest: mpg (14th of 17, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $73,400 | 16th of 19 | 17% | |
| Best combined mpg | 16 mpg | 14th of 17 | 13% | |
| Most horsepower | 473 hp | 8th of 19 | 61% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 18.5 cu ft | 13th of 17 | 19% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.5 in | 10th of 13 | 17% | |
| Max towing | 4,400 lb | 12th of 17 | 13% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Hyundai Nexo 29.6 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 4xe 27.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
Show all 17
- Audi SQ5 25.1 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 25.1 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
- Porsche Macan 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
No figure: BMW X6, Mercedes-Benz GLE.
SUVs in 2021: 145. The photo shows the 19 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree