Is the 2020 Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
12thof 24
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 40.3 cu ft.
- 12th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (5th of 24), rear legroom (6th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (16th of 24, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $30,545 | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 16th of 24 | 17% | |
| Most horsepower | 276 hp | 17th of 24 | 26% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 40.3 cu ft | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.4 in | 6th of 24 | 78% | |
| Max towing | 5,000 lb | 5th of 24 | 35% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Honda Passport 50.5 cu ft
- Toyota Highlander 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 47.7 cu ft
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Subaru Ascent 47.0 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 46.0 cu ft
Show all 24
- Acura MDX 43.4 cu ft
- Acura MDX Sport Hybrid 43.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 41.7 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas Cross Sport 40.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 36.3 cu ft
- Subaru Outback 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Murano 32.1 cu ft
- Chevrolet Blazer 30.5 cu ft
- Lexus RX 23.0 cu ft
- Kia Telluride 21.0 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 18.0 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 16.0 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Dodge Journey 10.7 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree