Is the 2020 Audi e-tron a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
11thof 21
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.2 cu ft.
- 11th of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (4th of 16), cargo (11th of 21).
- Weakest: towing (18th of 19, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $77,400 | 13th of 21 | 40% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 402 hp | 14th of 21 | 35% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.2 cu ft | 11th of 21 | 50% | |
| Rear legroom | 39.1 in | 4th of 16 | 73% | |
| Max towing | 4,000 lb | 18th of 19 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 81.0 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.7 cu ft
- Toyota Land Cruiser 43.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 41.2 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 31.8 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
Show all 21
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 27.2 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.1 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 20.5 cu ft
- Maserati Levante 20.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 19.7 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 17.6 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 14.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2020: 136. The photo shows the 21 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree