2024 Ford Mustang dimensions: length, width, height, weight, cargo
Length
189.4in long
- 15 ft 9.4 in. 4.81 m.
- 75.6 in wide, 55.0 in tall. 3,579 lb.
- EcoBoost RWD.
- Mid-size coupe.
Dimensions by trim
| Trim | Length | Width | With mirrors | Height | Wheelbase | Turning circle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EcoBoost RWD | 189.4 in | 75.6 in | 81.9 in | 55.0 in | 107.0 in | 36.5 ft |
| EcoBoost Fastback RWD | 189.4 in | 75.4 in | 76.1 in | 55.0 in | 107.0 in | 36.5 ft |
| EcoBoost Premium RWD, GT RWD, GT Premium RWD | 189.4 in | 75.6 in | 81.9 in | 55.0 in | 107.0 in | 37.8 ft |
| EcoBoost Premium Fastback RWD, GT Fastback RWD, GT Premium Fastback RWD | 189.4 in | 75.4 in | 76.1 in | 55.0 in | 107.0 in | 37.8 ft |
| EcoBoost RWD | 189.4 in | 75.4 in | 81.9 in | 54.8 in | 107.0 in | 36.5 ft to 37.8 ft |
| EcoBoost Premium RWD, GT Premium RWD | 189.4 in | 75.4 in | 81.9 in | 54.8 in | 107.0 in | 37.8 ft |
| Dark Horse Fastback RWD | 189.7 in | 76.1 in | 76.1 in | 55.2 in | 107.0 in | 37.8 ft |
| Dark Horse RWD | 189.7 in | 75.6 in | 81.9 in | 55.2 in | 107.0 in | 37.8 ft |
| Trim | Curb weight |
|---|---|
| EcoBoost RWD, EcoBoost Premium RWD | 3,579 lb |
| EcoBoost Fastback RWD, EcoBoost Premium Fastback RWD | 3,579 lb |
| EcoBoost RWD, EcoBoost Premium RWD | 3,747 lb |
| GT Fastback RWD, GT Premium Fastback RWD | 3,741 lb |
| GT RWD, GT Premium RWD, Dark Horse RWD | 3,741 lb |
| GT Premium RWD | 3,933 lb |
| Dark Horse Fastback RWD | 3,879 lb |
| Trim | Cargo, seats up | Cargo, max | Passenger volume | Front legroom | Rear legroom | Front headroom | Rear headroom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EcoBoost RWD, EcoBoost Premium RWD, GT RWD, GT Premium RWD, Dark Horse RWD | 13.3 cu ft | 13.3 cu ft | 82.8 cu ft | 44.5 in | 29.0 in | 37.6 in | 34.8 in |
| EcoBoost Fastback RWD, EcoBoost Premium Fastback RWD, GT Fastback RWD, GT Premium Fastback RWD, Dark Horse Fastback RWD | 13.3 cu ft | 13.3 cu ft | 82.8 cu ft | 44.5 in | 29.0 in | 37.6 in | 34.8 in |
| EcoBoost RWD, EcoBoost Premium RWD, GT Premium RWD | 10.3 cu ft | 10.3 cu ft | 79.2 cu ft | 44.5 in | 29.2 in | 37.6 in | 35.7 in |
Weight
- Curb weight
- 3,579 lb
- Kilograms
- 1,623 kg
- US tons
- 1.8 tons
EcoBoost RWD. All trims: 3,579 lb to 3,933 lb.
Heavier than 45% of 30 coupes (2024).
Garage fit
| Garage | Fits | Spare length | Each side |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single, 12 x 22 ft | Yes | 74.6 in | 34.2 in |
| Single, 14 x 24 ft | Yes | 98.6 in | 46.2 in |
| Double, 20 x 20 ft | Yes | 50.6 in | 82.2 in |
| Double, 24 x 24 ft | Yes | 98.6 in | 106.2 in |
| Door | Fits | Spare width | Above roof |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 ft wide, 7 ft tall | Yes | 14.1 in | 29.0 in |
| 9 ft wide, 7 ft tall | Yes | 26.1 in | 29.0 in |
Door width check uses the mirrors: 81.9 in.
Your garage
Second car
Garage 12 x 22 ft. Door 9 x 7 ft.
- Yes. 74.6 in spare length. 34.2 in each side.
- Door: 26.1 in spare width. 29.0 in above the roof.
Size class
Mid-size coupe.
Longer than 84% of 32 coupes (2024).
Median of 32 coupes (2024): 184.8 in long.
Cargo, seats up: 13.3 cu ft. More than 89% of 20 coupes (2024).
Bigger and smaller rivals
| Model | Length | vs Mustang | Cargo, seats up | vs Mustang |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dodge Charger Daytona | 206.6 in | +17.2 in | N/A | N/A |
| Bentley Continental GT | 190.9 in | +1.5 in | 12.6 cu ft | -0.7 cu ft |
| Ford Mustang | 189.4 in | - | 13.3 cu ft | - |
| Chevrolet Camaro | 188.3 in | -1.1 in | 9.1 cu ft | -4.2 cu ft |
| Aston Martin DB12 | 186.0 in | -3.4 in | 9.2 cu ft | -4.1 cu ft |
| Subaru BRZ | 167.9 in | -21.5 in | 6.3 cu ft | -7.0 cu ft |
| Toyota GR86 | 167.9 in | -21.5 in | 6.3 cu ft | -7.0 cu ft |
Legroom and headroom
EcoBoost RWD.
- Front legroom
- 44.5 inMore than 82% of 18 coupes (2024).
- Rear legroom
- 29.0 inMore than 20% of 16 coupes (2024).
- Front headroom
- 37.6 inMore than 26% of 20 coupes (2024).
- Rear headroom
- 34.8 inMore than 29% of 18 coupes (2024).
What this cannot tell you
Outline is a body-style template scaled to these numbers.
Garage fit ignores shelves, steps and open doors.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree