Alfa Romeo 4C vs Jaguar F TYPE (2020)
Price gap, MSRP + destination
$5,995
- 4C: 2 mpg better, 0.4 s quicker to 60.
- F TYPE: $5,995 cheaper, 59 hp more.
- F TYPE wins 5 of 10 measures.
| Measure | 4C | F TYPE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSRP + destination | $68,745 | $62,750 | F TYPE |
| Horsepower | 237 hp | 296 hp | F TYPE |
| Torque | 258 lb-ft | 295 lb-ft | F TYPE |
| MPG combined | 28 mpg | 26 mpg | 4C |
| Cargo, max | 3.7 cu ft | 14.4 cu ft | F TYPE |
| Cargo, seats up | 3.7 cu ft | N/A | N/A |
| Front legroom | 42.7 in | 42.8 in | About the same |
| Length | 157.0 in | 176.5 in | Not scored |
| Width | 73.5 in | 75.7 in | Not scored |
| Curb weight | 2,487 lb | 3,360 lb | Not scored |
| Seats | 2 | 2 | About the same |
| Ground clearance | 4.5 in | 3.9 in | 4C |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0 s estimate | 5.4 s tested | 4C |
| Basic warranty | 4 yr / 50,000 mi | 5 yr / 60,000 mi | F TYPE |
Not scored: length, width, curb weight. N/A rows are not counted.
Nearest trims by price
| Trim | Nearest in price | Gap |
|---|---|---|
| 4C Spider RWD $67,150 | F TYPE P300 RWD $64,700 | $2,450 |
| F TYPE P300 RWD $61,600 | 4C Spider RWD $67,150 | $5,550 |
Cost to run
F TYPE costs $5,362 less over 6 years.
12,000 miles a year. Gas $3.20. Electricity 17 cents per kWh.
| Cost | 4C | F TYPE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP + destination | $68,745 | $62,750 |
| Fuel or charging, 1 year | $1,371 | $1,477 |
| Fuel or charging, 6 years | $8,229 | $8,862 |
| Total, 6 years | $76,974 | $71,612 |
Which is better for me?
Weight each group from 0 to 10. MPG uses fuel or charging cost.
Equal weights: F TYPE wins.
No single weight change flips the winner.
| Group | Ahead | By |
|---|---|---|
| Price | F TYPE | 9% |
| MPG | 4C | 7% |
| Power | F TYPE | 20% |
| Space | F TYPE | 74% |
| Towing | N/A |
Other years
What this cannot tell you
Your price and mpg will differ.
Reliability and safety are not included.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree