Is the 2026 Volvo EX40 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 18 SUVs
16thof 18
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.0 cu ft.
- 16th of 18 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (1st of 18), towing (8th of 10).
- Weakest: price (18th of 18).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $55,150 | 18th of 18 | 0% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 402 hp | 1st of 18 | 100% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.0 cu ft | 16th of 18 | 6% | |
| Rear legroom | 36.1 in | 12th of 17 | 19% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 8th of 10 | 22% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Land Rover Discovery Sport 32.4 cu ft
- Volkswagen ID.4 30.3 cu ft
- Audi Q3 29.0 cu ft
- Lincoln Corsair 27.6 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron 26.1 cu ft
- Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 26.0 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
Show all 18
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- Buick Envision 25.2 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLB 22.0 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.4 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo EX40 16.0 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 18 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree