Is the 2026 Nissan LEAF a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
20thof 24
- No. Top half on 1 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 20.0 cu ft.
- 20th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (12th of 24), price (13th of 24).
- Weakest: rear legroom (23rd of 23).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29,990 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 214 hp | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 20.0 cu ft | 20th of 24 | 13% | |
| Rear legroom | 31.8 in | 23rd of 23 | 0% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 29.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- BMW X2 25.3 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Nissan LEAF 20.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree