Is the 2026 Lamborghini Urus a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
22ndof 24
- Top half on 2 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.0 cu ft.
- 22nd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (2nd of 24), towing (8th of 22).
- Weakest: cargo (22nd of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Best combined mpg | 20 mpg | 15th of 20 | 16% | |
| Most horsepower | 788 hp | 2nd of 24 | 96% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.0 cu ft | 22nd of 24 | 9% | |
| Rear legroom | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | 7,000 lb | 8th of 22 | 62% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota Grand Highlander 57.9 cu ft
- Lexus TX 57.4 cu ft
- GMC Acadia 57.3 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Honda Pilot 48.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Hyundai Palisade 46.3 cu ft
Show all 24
- Ford Explorer 46.0 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Lincoln Aviator 42.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover 40.9 cu ft
- Mazda CX-70 39.6 cu ft
- Audi Q7 35.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Volvo EX90 35.6 cu ft
- Aston Martin DBX 22.5 cu ft
- Hyundai Ioniq 9 21.9 cu ft
- BMW XM 18.6 cu ft
- Bentley Bentayga 17.0 cu ft
- Lamborghini Urus 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree