Is the 2026 Jeep Compass a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
5thof 24
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 27.2 cu ft.
- 5th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (3rd of 24), cargo (5th of 24).
- Weakest: mpg (17th of 21, tied with 2).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29,550 | 13th of 24 | 48% | |
| Best combined mpg | 26 mpg | 17th of 21 | 10% | |
| Most horsepower | 200 hp | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 27.2 cu ft | 5th of 24 | 83% | |
| Rear legroom | 38.3 in | 3rd of 24 | 91% | |
| Max towing | 2,000 lb | 5th of 10 | 56% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Nissan Kicks 30.0 cu ft
- Audi Q3 29.0 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
- Chevrolet Trax 25.6 cu ft
- Hyundai Kona 25.5 cu ft
Show all 24
- Chevrolet Trailblazer 25.3 cu ft
- Toyota C-HR 25.3 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 25.0 cu ft
- Honda HR-V 24.4 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 24.0 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Subaru Uncharted 23.0 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- Nissan LEAF 20.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.0 cu ft
- Lexus UX Hybrid 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2026: 182. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree