Is the 2026 Audi S e-tron GT a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 7 sedans
6thof 7
- No. Top half on 0 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 9.2 cu ft.
- 6th of 7 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: power (5th of 8), price (6th of 8).
- Weakest: cargo (6th of 7, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $127,700 | 6th of 8 | 29% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 670 hp | 5th of 8 | 43% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 9.2 cu ft | 6th of 7 | 0% | |
| Rear legroom | 32.2 in | 5th of 6 | 0% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Audi RS 7 25.0 cu ft
- BMW M5 17.7 cu ft
- Porsche Panamera 17.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS 15.5 cu ft
- Porsche Taycan 14.3 cu ft
- Audi RS e-tron GT 9.2 cu ft
- Audi S e-tron GT 9.2 cu ft
No figure: Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing.
Sedans in 2026: 71. The photo shows the 8 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree