Is the 2025 Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 SUVs
19thof 20
- No. Top half on 0 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 15.5 cu ft.
- 19th of 20 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: power (12th of 20), price (16th of 20).
- Weakest: cargo (19th of 20).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $105,250 | 16th of 20 | 21% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 536 hp | 12th of 20 | 42% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 15.5 cu ft | 19th of 20 | 5% | |
| Rear legroom | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Max towing | 3,500 lb | 17th of 19 | 6% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Tesla Model X 85.8 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 46.7 cu ft
- Lexus LX 44.0 cu ft
- Audi SQ7 35.7 cu ft
- Volvo EX90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 31.9 cu ft
- Audi Q8 30.5 cu ft
Show all 20
- Audi RS Q8 30.5 cu ft
- Audi SQ8 30.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV80 Coupe 29.3 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- BMW X6 M 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.3 cu ft
- Lotus Eletre 24.0 cu ft
- Lucid Gravity 21.3 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 20.3 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLS 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV 15.5 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
SUVs in 2025: 195. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree