Is the 2025 Audi S7 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 19 sedans
3rdof 19
- No. Top half on 1 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 24.6 cu ft.
- 3rd of 19 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (3rd of 19), price (15th of 21).
- Weakest: power (14th of 20, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $85,700 | 15th of 21 | 30% | |
| Best combined mpg | 22 mpg | 8th of 12 | 27% | |
| Most horsepower | 444 hp | 14th of 20 | 26% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 24.6 cu ft | 3rd of 19 | 89% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.0 in | 7th of 16 | 27% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Audi A6 Allroad 30.0 cu ft
- Audi A7 24.9 cu ft
- Audi S7 24.6 cu ft
- Audi S5 22.6 cu ft
- BMW 5 Series 18.4 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQE 18.4 cu ft
- Audi A6 e-tron 17.7 cu ft
- BMW M5 17.7 cu ft
Show all 19
- Porsche Panamera 17.4 cu ft
- BMW i5 17.3 cu ft
- BMW M3 16.9 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz EQS 15.5 cu ft
- Porsche Taycan 14.3 cu ft
- Audi S6 e-tron Sportback 14.0 cu ft
- Audi A6 13.7 cu ft
- Audi S6 13.7 cu ft
- Volvo S90 13.5 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 12.7 cu ft
- Karma Revero 6.4 cu ft
No figure: Audi e-tron GT, Lucid Air.
Sedans in 2025: 83. The photo shows the 21 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree