Is the 2023 Mercedes-Benz S-Class a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 5 sedans
1stof 5
- Yes. Top half on 3 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 19.4 cu ft.
- 1st of 5 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (1st of 5), rear legroom (1st of 6).
- Weakest: price (5th of 6).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $114,500 | 5th of 6 | 20% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 621 hp | 2nd of 6 | 80% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 19.4 cu ft | 1st of 5 | 100% | |
| Rear legroom | 49.1 in | 1st of 6 | 100% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz S-Class 19.4 cu ft
- BMW 7 Series 19.1 cu ft
- BMW i7 17.7 cu ft
- Audi A8 12.5 cu ft
- Genesis G90 12.0 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQS.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 6 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree