Is the 2023 Mazda MX-30 a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
18thof 24
- No. Top half on 0 of 4 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 21.0 cu ft.
- 18th of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: price (15th of 24), cargo (18th of 24).
- Weakest: power (24th of 24).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $34,110 | 15th of 24 | 39% | |
| Best combined mpg | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
| Most horsepower | 143 hp | 24th of 24 | 0% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 21.0 cu ft | 18th of 24 | 26% | |
| Rear legroom | 30.1 in | 23rd of 23 | 0% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Nissan Rogue Sport 36.3 cu ft
- Ford Bronco Sport 32.5 cu ft
- Volkswagen Taos 27.9 cu ft
- Jeep Compass 27.2 cu ft
- Dodge Hornet 27.0 cu ft
- Kia Seltos 26.6 cu ft
- Toyota Corolla Cross 26.5 cu ft
- BMW X1 25.7 cu ft
Show all 24
- Audi Q3 23.7 cu ft
- Buick Encore GX 23.5 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 23.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 22.9 cu ft
- Kia Niro 22.8 cu ft
- Jaguar E PACE 22.4 cu ft
- Mitsubishi Outlander Sport 21.7 cu ft
- BMW X2 21.6 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 21.5 cu ft
- Mazda MX-30 21.0 cu ft
- Subaru Crosstrek 20.8 cu ft
- Mazda CX-30 20.2 cu ft
- MINI Countryman 17.6 cu ft
- Lexus UX 17.1 cu ft
- Volvo XC40 16.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 15.4 cu ft
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree