Is the 2023 Lexus GX a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 21 SUVs
2ndof 21
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 46.7 cu ft.
- 2nd of 21 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 21), towing (8th of 20).
- Weakest: mpg (18th of 18).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $58,875 | 12th of 24 | 52% | |
| Best combined mpg | 16 mpg | 18th of 18 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 301 hp | 22nd of 23 | 5% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 46.7 cu ft | 2nd of 21 | 95% | |
| Rear legroom | 34.1 in | 18th of 20 | 11% | |
| Max towing | 6,500 lb | 8th of 20 | 63% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Toyota 4Runner 47.2 cu ft
- Lexus GX 46.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Discovery 45.0 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 37.7 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe 37.7 cu ft
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
- Volvo XC90 35.6 cu ft
- BMW iX 35.5 cu ft
Show all 21
- Genesis GV80 34.9 cu ft
- Lexus RZ 34.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
- BMW X5 33.9 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 32.0 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
- Lexus RX 29.6 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- BMW X6 27.4 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne 27.2 cu ft
- Maserati Grecale 20.1 cu ft
- Porsche Cayenne Coupe 19.4 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, Mercedes-Benz GLE, Polestar 3.
SUVs in 2023: 181. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree