Is the 2023 BMW 7 Series a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 7 sedans
2ndof 7
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 19.1 cu ft.
- 2nd of 7 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (1st of 6), cargo (2nd of 7).
- Weakest: power (4th of 8, tied with 1).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $95,700 | 4th of 8 | 57% | |
| Best combined mpg | 27 mpg | 1st of 6 | 100% | |
| Most horsepower | 536 hp | 4th of 8 | 43% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 19.1 cu ft | 2nd of 7 | 83% | |
| Rear legroom | 43.3 in | 3rd of 7 | 67% | |
| Max towing | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz S-Class 19.4 cu ft
- BMW 7 Series 19.1 cu ft
- Maserati Quattroporte 18.7 cu ft
- BMW i7 17.7 cu ft
- Lexus LS 16.9 cu ft
- Audi A8 12.5 cu ft
- Genesis G90 12.0 cu ft
No figure: Mercedes-Benz EQS.
Sedans in 2023: 88. The photo shows the 8 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree