Is the 2022 Toyota Sequoia a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 20 SUVs
2ndof 20
- Top half on 3 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 66.6 cu ft.
- 2nd of 20 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 20), rear legroom (6th of 20).
- Weakest: mpg (19th of 19).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $50,500 | 14th of 20 | 32% | |
| Best combined mpg | 15 mpg | 19th of 19 | 0% | |
| Most horsepower | 381 hp | 11th of 20 | 47% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 66.6 cu ft | 2nd of 20 | 95% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.9 in | 6th of 20 | 74% | |
| Max towing | 7,400 lb | 9th of 19 | 56% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Chevrolet Tahoe 72.6 cu ft
- Toyota Sequoia 66.6 cu ft
- Ford Expedition 63.6 cu ft
- Volkswagen Atlas 55.5 cu ft
- Acura MDX 48.4 cu ft
- Ford Explorer 47.9 cu ft
- Dodge Durango 43.3 cu ft
- Land Rover Defender 34.0 cu ft
Show all 20
- GMC Yukon 25.5 cu ft
- Buick Enclave 23.6 cu ft
- Rivian R1S 17.7 cu ft
- Jeep Grand Cherokee L 17.2 cu ft
- INFINITI QX80 16.6 cu ft
- Nissan Pathfinder 16.6 cu ft
- Nissan Armada 16.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX60 14.5 cu ft
- Mazda CX-9 14.4 cu ft
- Audi Q7 14.2 cu ft
- BMW X7 12.8 cu ft
- Cadillac XT6 12.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree