Is the 2022 Toyota Avalon a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 sedans
4thof 17
- Yes. Top half on 4 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 16.1 cu ft.
- 4th of 17 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: rear legroom (1st of 20), mpg (2nd of 19).
- Weakest: towing (4th of 8, tied with 4).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $36,825 | 7th of 20 | 68% | |
| Best combined mpg | 44 mpg | 2nd of 19 | 89% | |
| Most horsepower | 301 hp | 13th of 20 | 32% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 16.1 cu ft | 4th of 17 | 81% | |
| Rear legroom | 40.4 in | 1st of 20 | 95% | |
| Max towing | 1,000 lb | 4th of 8 | 0% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class 35.0 cu ft
- Dodge Charger 16.5 cu ft
- Chrysler 300 16.3 cu ft
- Toyota Avalon 16.1 cu ft
- Volkswagen Passat 15.9 cu ft
- Nissan Altima 15.4 cu ft
- Toyota Camry 15.1 cu ft
- Nissan Maxima 14.3 cu ft
Show all 17
- BMW 5 Series 14.0 cu ft
- Lexus ES 13.9 cu ft
- Acura TLX 13.5 cu ft
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Volvo S90 13.5 cu ft
- Genesis G80 13.1 cu ft
- Cadillac CT5 11.9 cu ft
- Jaguar XF 10.5 cu ft
- Toyota Mirai 9.6 cu ft
No figure: Kia Stinger, Mercedes-Benz E-Class All Terrain, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2022: 92. The photo shows the 20 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree