Is the 2022 Land Rover Range Rover Velar a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 24 SUVs
2ndof 24
- No. Top half on 2 of 6 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 34.4 cu ft.
- 2nd of 24 SUVs close in size and price.
- Best: cargo (2nd of 24), power (8th of 23).
- Weakest: towing (20th of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $58,300 | 18th of 24 | 26% | |
| Best combined mpg | 23 mpg | 12th of 19 | 33% | |
| Most horsepower | 395 hp | 8th of 23 | 68% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 34.4 cu ft | 2nd of 24 | 96% | |
| Rear legroom | 37.2 in | 17th of 24 | 26% | |
| Max towing | 1,653 lb | 20th of 22 | 10% |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Lincoln Nautilus 37.2 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Velar 34.4 cu ft
- INFINITI QX50 31.4 cu ft
- Tesla Model Y 30.2 cu ft
- Cadillac XT5 30.0 cu ft
- Ford Mustang Mach-E 29.7 cu ft
- Acura RDX 29.5 cu ft
- Genesis GV70 28.9 cu ft
Show all 24
- BMW X3 28.7 cu ft
- Audi e-tron 28.5 cu ft
- Audi e-tron S 28.5 cu ft
- Jeep Wrangler 4xe 27.7 cu ft
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 27.5 cu ft
- INFINITI QX55 26.9 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 25.9 cu ft
- Audi Q5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Audi SQ5 Sportback 24.7 cu ft
- Kia EV6 24.4 cu ft
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 18.5 cu ft
- BMW X4 M 18.5 cu ft
- Volvo XC60 17.1 cu ft
- Lexus RX 16.0 cu ft
- Lexus GX 11.6 cu ft
SUVs in 2022: 166. The photo shows the 24 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree