Is the 2020 Jaguar XE a good car?
Cargo behind rear seats: rank among 17 sedans
8thof 17
- No. Top half on 2 of 5 numbers.
- Cargo behind rear seats: 12.1 cu ft.
- 8th of 17 sedans close in size and price.
- Best: mpg (6th of 22), cargo (8th of 17).
- Weakest: rear legroom (17th of 22).
- Published numbers only. Not a quality or safety rating.
| Subject | Figure | Place | Beats | Class |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $39,900 | 17th of 23 | 27% | |
| Best combined mpg | 28 mpg | 6th of 22 | 67% | |
| Most horsepower | 296 hp | 17th of 23 | 27% | |
| Cargo behind rear seats | 12.1 cu ft | 8th of 17 | 56% | |
| Rear legroom | 35.0 in | 17th of 22 | 24% | |
| Max towing | 4,079 lb | N/A | N/A |
Roll call: cargo behind rear seats
- Audi A4 Allroad 24.2 cu ft
- Audi A5 Sportback 22.0 cu ft
- Lexus GS 18.4 cu ft
- BMW 3 Series 17.0 cu ft
- Tesla Model 3 15.0 cu ft
- Acura TLX 14.3 cu ft
- INFINITI Q50 13.5 cu ft
- Jaguar XE 12.1 cu ft
Show all 17
- Audi A4 12.0 cu ft
- Audi S4 12.0 cu ft
- Subaru WRX STI 12.0 cu ft
- Volvo S60 11.6 cu ft
- Lexus IS 10.8 cu ft
- Cadillac CT4 10.7 cu ft
- Genesis G70 10.5 cu ft
- Audi RS 3 10.0 cu ft
- Mercedes-Benz A-Class 8.6 cu ft
No figure: Alfa Romeo Giulia, Ford Fusion Energi, Kia Stinger, Mercedes-Benz CLA, Subaru WRX, Volkswagen Arteon.
Sedans in 2020: 106. The photo shows the 23 closest in size and price.
What this cannot tell you
Six published numbers. No quality, reliability or safety data.
Each figure is the model's best trim. No one trim has them all.
- 2 or more sources
- 1 source
- Model-level, rule or estimate
- Sources disagree